Quick answer: Investigators are collecting multiple videos because the Evanston encounter is described differently by witnesses and an involved federal agent. Police say they are preserving body-camera and in-car footage and gathering recordings from community members.
Why video matters
A recording can help establish where the encounter began, what commands were given, when physical contact started and how the agents left. One clip may cover only part of an event, so investigators need to compare multiple sources.
Witness evidence
Miguel Angel Olivares told NBC Chicago that he recorded the encounter and believed the agents used very rough force. Another witness, Ryan Garton, described seeing an agent press a knee against the resident’s back and said he saw blood. Those remain witness accounts.
Federal response
DHS told CNN that ICE agents encountered someone who resembled their target, identified themselves and gave commands. DHS said the individual was not cooperative and that agents relied on their training. The statement did not resolve the injury issue.
What comes next
Police say additional video is still being collected and reviewed. Readers should distinguish verified footage from captions or interpretations that go beyond what a clip shows.
Related video:
What changed in the latest reporting?
Reporting published Sept. 22 adds a witness account from Ryan Garton, who told Evanston Wire that he saw the man pinned to the ground and later saw blood. That is a witness account, not a final investigative finding. Evanston police continue to review video and other evidence. DHS separately told CNN that ICE agents encountered someone who resembled their target, identified themselves and said the individual was not cooperative.
Related coverage
From a Fugitive Search to a Hospital Visit: Reconstructing the Evanston Case
Why Investigators Are Collecting Every Video From the Evanston ICE Incident
Two Accounts, One Investigation: What Evanston Police and DHS Have Said
Inside the Unanswered Questions Surrounding the Evanston Federal Detention
Evanston ICE Incident: A Fact Check of What Is Confirmed and What Remains Unclear
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there video?
Yes. Witness video has been reported and police say more footage is being collected.
Does one clip show everything?
No public source reviewed here establishes that.
Sources and further reading: Evanston Police Department · CNN Español · Univision Chicago · Democracy Now!
Latest reporting check — Sept. 23, 2026
As of Sept. 23, the latest reporting reviewed continues to describe the case as an active Evanston police investigation. CNN reported that surveillance video appears to show two agents and the man in an upright struggle before the federal agents pulled him to the ground, while noting that the available clip does not show what happened after they moved out of camera view. CNN also reported that DHS said the agents encountered someone who resembled their target, identified themselves and said the person was not cooperative. Evanston police said they are preserving body-camera footage, in-car video and witness material. These accounts remain attributed, and the investigation has not publicly resolved every disputed detail. Univision Chicago's Sept. 22 video report provides additional local coverage.
Fact-check note
This article distinguishes the Netflix dramatization from documented history. Lizzie Borden was acquitted in 1893; claims about guilt, private relationships, motives and events not established by surviving records are described as fictionalized or disputed rather than settled fact.
Netflix Tudum: The True Story · Netflix Tudum: Ending Explained · PEOPLE: Fact vs Fiction · PEOPLE: Emma/Lizzie Fact Check
